As a continuation to my article on Shami(http://justpaste.it/ShamiasIknew ), I would shed some light on why I stopped supported Dawlah much before. The key point was when Dawlah’s soldiers themselves told me about their beliefs some of whom are.
-> Anyone who does’nt make takfir of Mursi is a kaffir himself.(Chain Takfir)
-> Ayman al Zawahiri is also a kaffir because he did’nt consider Mursi one.
-> This makes people like Abdullah Azzam(rh) also kuffar.
Now, one might say that these were the views of *some* within Dawlah but I realized soon enough that it was’nt the case. Later on, it was proven that
->IS made takfir of leaders of JabhatulIslamiyah officially.
->Amir of JayshulMuhajirin wal Ansar testified that they make takfir of JabhatalNusrah and JabhatulIslamiyah.
Another major reason as to why IS is not among the righteous group is that.
-> People who have spent their entire lives in Jihad, who were companions of men like Abdullah Azzam(rh), Osama bin Laden(rh) and others have testified against it. Among whom are Abu Firas al Suri, Abu Hammam al Suri, Abu Khalid al Suri, Abu Dujana al Pasha and others. IS on the contrary have few or almost none such figures. Which makes us wonder WHY ?
-> They have almost no support from Rigtheous Ulema(not the palace ones).
I ask youth of today who support Dawlah, how do you think you know more than Ulema and people who have been Jihad for more than your age and are far more trustworthier.
Furthermore, I say that the issue is not only about Dawlah, it is of Ghuloo and the issue of Ghuloo is not something related to an organization or some time. Its like a disease that has persisted not only among this Ummah but the previous ones.
All IS has done is that it has gathered Ghulaat everywhere behind it.
Consider for example
-> In West, deviants like Abdullah al Faisal, Muhajiroon immediately supported Dawlah.
-> In Algeria, the remanants of GIA came to their support.
and so on. And Allah(swt) has his own plan. Also Allah(swt) does’nt accept anything except pure. May be before the responsiblity of making the Ummah victorious, its necessary that ranks of Mujahidin be cleansed of Ghuloo and deviant beliefs. This Ghuloo was present among those who used to ascribe themselves to the Salafi Jihadi movement even though the leadership of Alqaeda like Atiyyah al Libi(rh), Abu Yahya(rh) and others were Far from it. It might still be present outside IS but most of it has come under the banner of IS.
Today, the calamity that has struck the Jihadi movement was something that was brewing for a lot of time. It was these ideas that were already present from before. The ideas that I am talking about are ones such as.
-> Making unconditional takfir of anyone associated with Democracy. Even if they are voters of an islamic party or people like Jamat e islami in Pakistan .
-> Making chain takfir of anyone who does’nt consider such a voter/party a kaffir. Much like making takfir of Sh Abdullah Azzam(rh) or Atiya al Libi who did not make takfir of people who go to the parliament to bring Shariah.
-> Making Chain Takfir of anyone who they claim has “sat” with the Kuffar. This means for example if JabhatalSuwar al Suriya took the aid of kuffar and JabhatulIslamiyah fought alongside JabhatulSuwar al Suriya against Bashar then both are kuffar. Not only that, if JabhatalNUsrah , JundulAqsa or others fight alongside JabhatulIslamiyah against Bashar, they all are Kuffar.
-> Slandering of Scholars.
-> Declaring or always trying to declare Khilafah without the majority of Ahl ul Hal wal Aqd. Using it to separate from Ummah and then fighting or making takfir of whosoever is not from amongst them. And this we find a common thing from among what GIA did, Jamat ul Takfir wal Hijra in Egypt did or JamatulMuslimeen in Pakistan did among others.
Add to this the fact, that not only Takfiri ideology is at work in case of IS but also lying, breaking of covenants, harboring Criminal, torture etc and other crimes. An example of lying is when Adnani said that they never referred anything to Zawahiri and then Sh Abdul Aziz al Qatari(rh) gave his testimony against it. I have no reason to doubt Qatari’s(rh) testimony as he has been for 3 decades in Jihad. Breaking of covenants too has been documented numerous time. Torture like one done to Abu Rayyan(rh) and then the video of torture of JN’s prisoners emerged.
Today IS has set its sights on eliminating other Mujahidin in Syria and is on offensive in Halab, Daraa and elsewhere. We ask Allah(swt) to defeat them and I don’t think that they will stop here. Brothers who still harbor sympathy towards them should know that they probably won’t stop and keep fighting the Mujahidin not only in Syria but elsewhere and that this issue does’nt look like fading away soon.
NOTE:: My views against Ghuloo does’nt mean that I support Marouf’s gangs or support of West against IS or for that matter the Shias or PKK. Nor do I support injustice done against them. I also think that one should keep Maslahah of Islam in mind while dealing with them just like Mujahidin had offered truce to IS but if they are bent upon aggression then Mujahidin have the right to defend themselves.
I will leave you guys with few useful quotes..
“If you see someone declaring a khilafah without consulting Muslims then either he is khariji or someone claiming to be Mahdi”
“If you see someone complicating Tawhid too much then he is either a khariji or a Mu’tazali.”
“If you see someone slandering scholars and cutting off from them then he is likely a khariji and if you see someone elevating few too high and accepting everything from them then he is likely a Madkhali”.